Legal Opinion

Culligan, Inc. v. Rheaume

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

These actions were before us on an appeal from an order allowing an inspection of documents, reported in Culligan, Inc., v. Rheaume (1954), 268 Wis. 298, 67 N. W. (2d) 279. The present appeal is by the defendants from an order granting a temporary injunction which restrains them from continuing certain activities in which they have engaged. The pleadings and numerous supporting affidavits disclose the following facts which we consider material.

One Culligan developed a process or technique of softening water on the premises of a water user. To exploit this method of water softening, Culligan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Culligan, Inc. v. RheaumeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mogen David Wine Corp. v. BorensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Fassbender v. PetersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State v. Golden Guernsey Dairy Co-OperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Ass'n of Food Dealers v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Aqua-Tech, Inc. v. Como Lake Protection & Rehabilitation DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Browne v. Milwaukee Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mercury Record Productions, Inc. v. Economic Consultants, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API