Vickers v. Stoneman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Case for slander. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.
This is an action on the case to recover damages for verbal slander. The declaration contains no matters of inducement, and no averment of collateral circumstances, but proceeds in two counts to set out the ■cause of action, as follows:
“ On February 20, A. D. 1887, at Waverly, in the county of Van Burén aforesaid, in a certain discourse which the said defendant then and there had with the said plaintiff, in the presence and hearing of divers good and worthy persons, did speak, publish, and declare, to, *420of, and concerning the said plaintiff these false, scandalous, and defamatory words, to wit:
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bourreseau v. Detroit Evening Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Andrews v. WoodmanseeNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Lewis v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Taylor v. KneelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
- Vaughan v. HavensNew York Supreme Court · 1811
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Locke v. PembrokeNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Van Auken v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Watson v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. BraggMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mertz v. SauvageauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.