Legal Opinion

People v. Bragg

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2012No. Docket No. 305140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, J.

Defendant, Samuel Dale Bragg, was bound over for trial on a first-degree criminal sexual conduct charge, based in part on the testimony of Pastor John Vaprezsan, who shared with the district court defendant’s admission to having sexually assaulted defendant’s then nine-year-old cousin. The circuit court quashed defendant’s statement to the pastor under the cleric-congregant privilege,1 leading to the prosecution’s interlocutory application for leave to appeal. Because defendant’s communication to Vaprezsan *437was privileged and confidential under MCL 767.5a(2), we affirm the circuit court’s…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. In Re Guilty Plea CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. MurrayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. People v. ProminskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. John Doe 1 v. Orchard Lake SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  5. People of Michigan v. Damon WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API