Legal Opinion

MacKley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 2011No. ED 94027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Presiding Judge.

Introduction

Movant, Edward Mackley, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We vacate the motion court’s judgment and remand the cause with directions to dismiss movant’s motion because movant failed to timely file his pro se motion.

Background

As part of a plea agreement, movant pled guilty to two counts of felony resisting arrest. At the plea hearing, the court found that movant’s pleas were voluntarily made and accepted the pleas. The court sentenced movant to four years’ imprisonment for each count of felony…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gehrke v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. Swofford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Searcy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Moore v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snyder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Barnes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Joshua S. Miller v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. SHANNON LEE DAVIDSON, a/k/a SHANNON LEE NELSON, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API