Legal Opinion
Financial Indemnity Co. v. Messick
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 9, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01585Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Financial Indemnity Company, No. 2:21-cv-01585-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Charles S. Messick, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The court submitted the 18 | matter without oral argument. For the reasons below, the court grants defendant’s motion. 19 | IT. BACKGROUND 20 On November 18, 2018, Charles C. Messick (“Driver”) lost control of the car he was 21 | driving, rolled down an embankment, and collided with a fence in Moffat…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.