Legal Opinion

(PC) Zaiza v. Clark

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 9, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01476Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, 1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA-PC 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Plaintiffs, RECOMMENDING THAT 13 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS vs. BE GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN 14 PART CLARK, et al., (ECF No. 21.) 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 19 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 20 Jose Roberto Zaiza (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the 22 Complaint…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API