Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cary v. Cochran

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1940No. 30774PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action of mandamus brought by a number of irrigators under the- Kearney canal, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, • and by the Central Power Company, which, with the exception of one small user of water, is the owner of the oldest water appropriation on the Platte river and its tributaries. The respondents are the *165governor, the state engineer, and the chief of the bureau of irrigation and his subordinates. The petition prays for the issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the proper administration and enforcement of the irrigation laws of the state for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers Canal Co. v. FrankNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Enterprise Irrigation District v. WillisNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State ex rel. Long v. BarstlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Platte Valley Irrigation District v. BryanNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Central Platte Natural Resources District v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Steele v. Locke Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. United States v. TilleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. In Re Birdwood Irr. Dist., Water Division No. 1-ANebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re 2007 Admin. of AppropriationsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API