Fungaroli v. Fungaroli

VAUGHN, Judge.

Plaintiff first challenges the propriety of Judge Freeman’s order granting attorney’s fees to defendant’s counsel. We hold that the judge acted properly in conducting the hearing on this motion and did not abuse his discretion in making the award and that the findings upon which the award was based were duly supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record.

Plaintiff’s first assignment of error, in this regard, is that the judge abused his discretion in denying his motion to continue the hearing on attorney’s fees. It is well settled that a motion for continuance is not…