Legal Opinion

Mulch v. Nagle

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1921No. Civ. No. 3646PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BARDIN, P. J., pro tem.

This is an appeal taken by the defendants from a judgment decreeing that a public highway extends along a certain twelve-foot strip of land located along the easterly boundary of two lots of land owned by the defendants, whose ownership of said lots was adjudged to be subservient to the rights of the public to use said strip of land as a public highway, and enjoining the defendants from erecting or maintaining any obstruction upon said strip of land in such manner as to interfere with the free use thereof as a highway by the public or by plaintiff as a part thereof.

In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Venice v. Short Line Beach Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Smith v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Fleming v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Game, Forestation & Parks Commission v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Black v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. State v. PortmannMontana Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API