Legal Opinion

Archer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1994No. CR-92-1706PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Mark D. Archer, appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing. He was disciplined for possessing a green leafy substance, believed to be marijuana, in violation of prison disciplinary rules. Archer contends he was denied due process at his prison disciplinary hearing, and that there was insufficient evidence presented at his hearing from which to determine that he had violated prison rules.

The evidentiary standard required to find that an inmate has violated a prison disciplinary rule is "some evidence."Superintendent,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ex Parte HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Whitson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Aaron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API