Legal Opinion

Aaron v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 31, 2001No. CR-00-1816Published

1Opinion of the Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

In a prison disciplinary proceeding, the appellant, Phillip Aaron, was found guilty of conspiracy to commit a violation of departmental or institutional rules, a violation of Rule # 91, Regulation # 403. He was sanctioned with, among several other things, the loss of one year, two months, and twenty-eight days of good time. The appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that prison officials violated his due process rights under Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), during the disciplinary proceeding. After the State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Archer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API