Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 5, 1997No. CR-96-1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LONG, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Joe Reynolds, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he was denied due process during a prison disciplinary hearing in which he was found guilty of violating Department of Corrections Admin. Reg. 403, Annex B., “Definitions and Examples of Rule Violations,” No. 65, “Possession of Unauthorized or Unprescribed Drugs, Intoxicants, or Paraphernalia.” The hearing officer based his determination of guilt on his finding that the appellant had in his possession “two (2) hand-rolled cigarettes with green…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ex Parte HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Whitson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API