Legal Opinion

Andrie Inc v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 2014No. Docket 145557PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.

Michigan’s Use Tax Act (UTA)1 imposes a 6% tax on a consumer’s use, storage, and consumption of all tangible personal property in Michigan.2 The UTA exempts the use of property from imposition of the use tax when “the [sales] tax was due and paid on the retail sale to a consumer.”3 Concurrently, Michigan’s General Sales Tax Act4 (GSTA) imposes a 6% tax on a retailer’s gross proceeds, to be remitted by the retailer to the *165Department of Treasury (the department).* ***5 At issue before this Court is whether a purchaser and user of tangible personal property may avail itself of the use tax…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Detroit Edison Company v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Santander Consumer USA Inc v. State TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Lewis R Hardenbergh v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Midwest Power Line Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Cannarbor Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API