Legal Opinion

Detroit Edison Company v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2015No. Docket 148753PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

The Use Tax Act (UTA), MCL 205.91 et seq., imposes a 6% tax “for the privilege of using, storing, or consuming tangible personal property in this state . . . .” MCL 205.93(1). However, the UTA exempts from the use tax property sold to “[a]n industrial processor for use or consumption in industrial processing.” MCL 205.94o(l)(a). At issue here is whether and to what extent, if any, an electric utility is entitled to the industrial-processing exemption for tangible personal property located outside its generation plants. The Court of Appeals held that plaintiff was entitled to the full…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Klooster v. City of CharlevoixMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Ter Beek v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tomra of North America Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Ketchum Estate v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. LaBELLE MANAGEMENT, INC v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURYMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. In re Escalera Resources Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2017
  5. City of Fraser v. Almeda UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API