Lauridsen v. Bowden, Gazzam & Arnold
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county, Alston, J., entered February 19, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Respondent brought this action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract to procure marine insurance upon a cargo of canned salmon to be shipped from Clallam county to Seattle in November, 1915. At the close of respondent’s proof, appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and moved the court for a judgment of nonsuit. Again, at the close of all the evidence, appellant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for appellant and against the respondent on the ground that the evidence failed to show any right of recovery on the part of respondent. And again,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- O'Daniel v. StreebyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Dyer v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Mattson v. Griffin Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Boulton v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921