Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. McGinnis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal to review a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on an oral contract of insurance. The sufficiency of the testimony to support the verdict is the only question presented for consideration. Taking the view of the testimony most favorable to the appellee, as we must, the facts are substantially as follows: March 26, 1927, the appellant, through Commercial Realty & Trust Company, its agency at Douglas, Ariz., issued a policy of insurance to T. P. McGinnis, the husband of the appellee, insuring him in the sum of $2,500 against loss or damage by fire on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Insurance Company v. McCainSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Meadows v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Gude v. Exchange Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- International Trust Co. v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Nat. Bank of Sapulpa v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- O'Boyle v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930