Legal Opinion

Geer v. Gellerman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1931No. 23206. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Appellants sued to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by appellant tbe wife in an automobile collision which occurred at the junction of the Pacific highway with the Bucoda highway within the corporate limits of Tenino on Labor day, September 2, 1929. Motions for nonsuit were interposed at the close of appellants’ case and at the close of the entire case, which were both deified by the trial court, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellants for two thousand five hundred dollars. Thereafter, respondents moved for a new trial and for a judgment non obstante veredicto,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Twedt v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Martin v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Jurisch v. Puget Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Romano v. Short Line Stage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Bell v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cook v. SeidenvergWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hart v. ClappWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Seattle Taxicab Co. v. Texas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API