Legal Opinion

Hart v. Clapp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1936No. 25589. En BancPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This case arises out of a collision between two automobiles at a street intersection in Tacoma. The plaintiff was a passenger in a car which collided with the car of the defendants. The defendant Mary Clapp was driving at the time.

The cause was tried to a jury. The court submitted the case to the jury upon the issues of negligence and contributory negligence. From judgment entered on a verdict in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.

The court gave the following instruction:

“You are instructed that the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to establish, by a fair preponderance of the evidence,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Jurisch v. Puget Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Romano v. Short Line Stage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Spurrier v. Front Street Cable Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Gallagher v. Town of BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Boyle v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Reines v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Archibald v. GossardWashington Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API