Legal Opinion

Bull v. Ziegler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 14, 1932No. 4-2724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith;, J.

Appellant says, in his brief, that “the only question to be determined on this appeal is whether or not the plaintiff in this case has a right to garnishee the State Highway Commission after filing suit in the Pulaski Circuit Court against the defendant, S. B. Ziegler, doing business as Ziegler Construction Company, which company holds an indebtedness against the State Highway Commission on account of constructing highways under a contract with the Highway Commission, and which has been specifically authorized to construct highways and to sue and be sued, the appellant being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Riggin v. HillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Henslee v. MobleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Welch Lumber Co. v. Carter Bros. & BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Baer v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watson v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Cargile v. New York Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Ross, Disbursing Agent v. RichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. State Ex Rel. Arkansas Construction Commission v. TolerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API