Legal Opinion

Baer v. Arkansas State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 11, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These are cases consolidated for the purposes of trial, brought separately in the second division of the Pulaski Circuit Court by appellants against the Arkansas State Highway Commission to recover from it for damages on account of personal injuries received by the several appellants on account of the alleged negligence of the employees of appellee while engaged in repairing certain State highways. The action sounded in tort.

Demurrers were filed to the several complaints on the ground that appellee was and is not liable in damages for the negligence of its employees.

The court sustained the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Little Rock v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Nelson Bros.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. State Highway Commission in Arkansas v. Kansas City Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Watson v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Cargile v. New York Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API