Legal Opinion

Daniel Friedlander v. Joseph Cimino, M.D., Individually and as Commissioner of the Department of Health of the City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 9, 1975No. 962, Docket 75-7122PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellants in this appeal initiated the underlying class action, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 suit in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appellants are non-physician, self-em ployed clinical laboratory directors who are subject to certain licensing requirements of New York State law and New York City Health Code regulations. 1 In their complaint, the appellants alleged that the defendants below had violated their Fifth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by requiring them, but not certain physicians, to perform proficiency tests prepared and graded by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Antonio Mareno, Jr. v. Thomas Rowe and Jet Aviation of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. E & T Realty v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Whelehan v. County of MonroeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1983
  4. Wilder v. BernsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  5. Glinka v. Dartmouth Banking Co. (In Re Kelton Motors Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API