Legal Opinion

Hayner v. Chittim

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1921No. 6491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Bexar County; S. G. Tayloe, Judge. Suit by Annie E. Cbittim against Denio B. Hayner and wife. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

In, the ease of Church v. Hay-ner, 201 S. W. 711, decided by this court between some of the same parties present then as here, appears a very comprehensive statement of facts peculiar to those arising in this case. In fact, they are the same facts in respect to the deed of trust taken as additional security on the same land to secure the note, and, in so far as applicable, are here referred to for a history of this case pertinent to the issues raised by the second assignment of error. This suit grows out of the same subject-matter touching the homestead controversies, and is predicated upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pitts v. ElslerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gilliam v. AlfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Doty v. BarnardTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Wheatley v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Taylor v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Becker v. MaillotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Anderson v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Wroten v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Niebuhr v. BehringerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API