Anderson v. Womack

(after stating the case as above).

The appellant presents the point, in effect, that the appellees were not entitled to recover a judgment for the notes and for foreclosure of the lien because the noites and lien were absolutely barred and the revivals and renewals were after the expiration of the period of limitation and after the homestead rights had become vested. This proposition entirely depends upon whether or not the renewals in evidence were all of them legally void and ineffectual. It may be conceded for the moment in determining the point that, as contended by appellant, the written…