Legal Opinion

Wroten v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1924No. 1585. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

By deed dated September 29, 1919, Mrs. J. C. Harrell conveyed to appellant Wroten a lot in Cisco. The dee’d recites a cash consideration of $200, and two notes for $600 each, of even date with the deed, due in one and two years, respectively, payable to the order of F. E. Harrell, and to secure their payment a vendor’s lien was expressly reserved in the conveyance.

Harrell indorsed the notes to appellee, Davis, who brought this suit to recover upon the notes and to foreclose the vendor’s lien against Wroten as maker and Harrell as in-dorser, alleging that he acquired the notes for value on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Love v. BreedloveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  2. Graves v. KinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Heidenheimer Bros. v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Harrison v. First Nat. Bank of LewisvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Jones v. MaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pickett v. Dallas Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Bird v. McCrory Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API