Hartman v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice.
The defendant-appellant, William E. Hartman, appeals from his judgments of conviction in the Superior Court on three counts of Rape in the Second Degree, one count of Rape in the Fourth Degree and one count of Unlawful Sexual Contact in the Third Degree. Hartman raises three arguments in this direct appeal. First, Hartman contends that his constitutional right to self-representation was violated when the trial court denied his motion to proceed pro se. Second, he contends that the trial court violated his constitutional right to confrontation when it denied his trial attorney…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.