Legal Opinion
State v. O'neil
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 21, 2001No. AC 19710PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*146 Opinion
HEALEY, J.
The defendant, Caesar O’Neil, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempt to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2)1 and 53a-54a (a).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction because the case that the state presented against him was one of attempt to incite the injury or killing of another person in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-179, an offense different from that alleged in the information.3 We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The jury…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. DamatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SaltersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.