Legal Opinion

Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board v. H & M Logging Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1971No. 1433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This appeal concerns a question of statutory construction: does our workmen’s compensation law, AS 23.30.205, as it was worded in 1967, provide for payment from the second injury fund to a claimant suffering from permanent partial disability ?

On September 7, 1967, Valgene Clothier was injured while in the employ of appel-lee H & M Logging Company. At the time of this injury, Mr. Clothier was already suffering from a permanent partial disability as the result of a previous industrial accident. The appellant, Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Board, found that the previous…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Second Injury Fund v. KeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. JB Warrack Company v. RoanAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Liberty Stevedoring Co. v. CardilloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1937
  4. Davis v. AlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ketchikan Gateway Borough v. SalingAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Employers Commercial Union Insurance Group v. ChristAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Alaska International Constructors v. State, Second Injury FundAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API