Legal Opinion

Second Injury Fund v. Keaton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1961No. A-8070PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

The primary question presented here is whether or not Article 8306, 1 Sections 12c, 12c-l, and 12-2, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, as amended, permits a recovery from the Second Injury Fund where as here the claimant sustained only partial incapacity as a result of general injuries. We have concluded to answer this question in the negative. Such answer requires that the judgments of both the trial court and the Court of Civil Appeals be reversed and judgment rendered that respondent take nothing by his suit.

Our decision on this question renders it unnecessary to decide petitioners’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miears v. Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Johnson v. DarrTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Rogers v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  4. Rogers v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Second Injury Fund v. KeatonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Anguiano v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Johnson v. Second Injury FundTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Wiggins, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1985
  5. Greenville Independent School District v. B & J Excavating, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API