Legal Opinion

Alaska International Constructors v. State, Second Injury Fund

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1988No. S-1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This workers’ compensation case involves the interpretation of the Second Injury Fund statute, AS 23.30.205. The Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) denied Alaska International Constructors’ request for reimbursement from the fund for benefits it pays to an injured employee, Oscar Kinter. The Board construed AS 23.30.205(c) strictly, and concluded that the employer failed to establish by written records that it had knowledge of Kinter’s preexisting impairment. 1 Alaska International and its insurer appealed the Board decision to the superior court, and Judge Peter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ketchikan Gateway Borough v. SalingAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Employers Commercial Union Insurance Group v. ChristAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sea-Land Services v. Second Injury FundAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board v. H & M Logging Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Special Disability Trust Fund v. WheelerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alaska International Constructors v. KinterAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Veco Alaska, Inc. v. State, Department of Labor, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury FundAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ashland-Greenwood Public Schools v. ThorellNebraska Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Baughman v. United-A.G. CooperativeNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State, Department of Labor & Workforce Development, Division of Workers' Compensation, Second Injury Fund v. Tongass Business CenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API