Power Control Devices, Inc. v. Lerner
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Arnold-Burger, J.:
In order to prevail in a claim of legal malpractice, "a plaintiff must establish the validity of the underlying claim by showing that it would have resulted in a favorable judgment in the underlying lawsuit had it not been for the attorney's error." Canaan v. Bartee , 276 Kan. 116 , 120, 72 P.3d 911 (2003). This is commonly referred to as proving the "case within a case." Here Power Control Devices (PCD) hired Michael "Mick" W. Lerner to represent it in a federal court breach of contract lawsuit against Orchid Technologies Engineering and Consulting (Orchid). The federal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Malone v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Pancake House, Inc. v. Redmond Ex Rel. RedmondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Canaan v. BarteeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- City of Arkansas City v. BrutonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Idstrom v. German May, PCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- LeTourneau v. Law Offices of Richard LesterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026