Iowa Nat. Bank of Ottumwa v. Sherman
South Dakota Supreme Court
On rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.
The facts in this case, now before us on rehearing, are stated in 17 S. D. 396, 97 N. W. 12, where it ap*239pears that the action is upon a promissory note executed by appellants to the Janney Manufacturing Company, and transferred to the respondent bank, before maturity, in the due course of business. As a complete defense appellants pleaded the breach of an express warranty, failure of consideration, and fraudulent representations as to certain farm machinery in settlement for which the note was executed, and the last two paragraphs of the answer are as follows: ‘‘That the said Jan-ney…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Joy v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Seehorn v. American National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- McGill v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lambert v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Barnard v. TidrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- First National Bank v. HarveySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Hudson v. SheafeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Iowa National Bank of Ottumwa v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909