Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Tidrick

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1915No. File No. 3584PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brule County. Hon. Frank B. Sm-itii, Judge. Action by Frederick Barnard and another, partners as Barnard & Miller, v. C. D. Tidrick, to recover against an indorsee on a promissory note. From a judgment 'for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiffs appeal. (i) Under point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: Blount v. Medbery, 16 S. D. 562; Taylor v. National Bank, 6 S. D. 511; Fargo Gas Light, etc., v. Elec.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brule County. Hon. Frank B. Sm-itii, Judge. Action by Frederick Barnard and another, partners as Barnard & Miller, v. C. D. Tidrick, to recover against an indorsee on a promissory note. From a judgment 'for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiffs appeal. (i) Under point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: Blount v. Medbery, 16 S. D. 562; Taylor v. National Bank, 6 S. D. 511; Fargo Gas Light, etc., v. Elec. Co., 37 L. R. A. 593; Liland v. Tweto, 125 N. W. (N. D.) 1032-8. (3) Under point three of the opinion, Respondent cited: Joyce Defences…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On April 1, 1912, defendant executed and delivered to the United Mercantile Agency of Chicago eight notes of $2,500 each, due August 1, 1912. This action was brought to recover on a note dated August 1, 1912, which note was given as a renewal of one of the eight notes above mentioned, and was •indorsed to the plaintiff who claimed to be an innocent purchaser. Defendant admitted the execution of the note, but alleged that the note of April 1, 1912, which was the only consideration for the note in suit, was obtained from defendant without consideration and by fraud and deceit; that the United…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alabama National Bank v. HalseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Marson v. DeitherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Columbia Electric Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Landauer v. Sioux Falls Imp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. McGill v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. La Beaume v. Smith, Albin PeayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Mundon v. GreenameyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Muschelwicz v. TidrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Jackson v. SabieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API