Legal Opinion
Eferakeya v. Twin City State Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 14, 1989No. 61,193PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Six, J.:
In this case we examine on appeal: (1) the use of an absent party’s deposition at trial under K.S.A. 1988 Supp. 60- 232(a)(3)(B); and (2) personal jurisdiction over a New York financial institution, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (MHT), a “collecting bank” as defined by the Uniform Commercial Code, K.S.A. 84-4-105(d).
The Court of Appeals vacated the trial court’s finding that the deposition of the absent plaintiff, Dr. Adego E. Eferakeya, could not be used at trial in lieu of his testimony. The Court of Appeals also reversed the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Smith v. Blakey, AdministratorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Dorothea Richmond v. Sherwood BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Robert J. Alfonso v. Dr. John C. LundCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- King v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Three Ten Enterprises, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- Rymer v. PoolDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Fleitas v. Union Chelsea National BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Thoren v. Lawrence Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997