Legal Opinion
Rymer v. Pool
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1992No. 91-CV-45PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge.
Appellant appeals from the dismissal of her suit for fraudulent inducement to marry because of her failure to appear and prosecute. On December 4, 1990, Judge Huhn, acting as the calendar control judge, denied appellant’s motion for a continuance. Judge Webber then dismissed appellant’s case when she failed to appear or present any evidence on the scheduled trial date of December 6, 1990. Judge Web-ber dismissed the case subject to a ruling by Judge Huhn on appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the motion for continuance. Judge Huhn denied that motion on January…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dorothea Richmond v. Sherwood BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Milton Properties, Inc. v. NewbyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Houser v. Snap-On Tools CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Walter Robert Stewart and Margaret Kester Stewart v. Joseph L. Meyers and Helen Margaret MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Joyner v. Jonathan Woodner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fischer v. Estate of FlaxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Duguma v. AyalewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- MARTHA DUGUMA v. BALEHAGER AYALEWDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016