Legal Opinion
In Re the Proposed Immediate Discharge of Etienne
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1990No. C4-90-651PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Relator, a teacher, challenges his immediate discharge, arguing that the hearing process used under Minn.Stat. § 125.12 (1988 and Supp.1989) is unconstitutional on its face and denied him due process. Relator also argues that the school board did not have substantial evidence to reject the hearing officer’s findings. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Independent School District No. 241 began proceedings to terminate one of its teachers, relator Lester Etienne, after receiving a letter from a former student in May 1989. The letter, to a former principal, discussed a sexual…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Liffrig v. Independent School Dist. No. 442Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Demotion of DillenbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992