Legal Opinion

In Re the Demotion of Dillenberger

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1992No. C0-92-53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Relator, a tenured teacher, challenges his demotion and reassignment by respondent school board. We affirm.

FACTS

Since 1972, relator Paul Dillenberger has been employed by respondent Special School District No. 1 (“school district”). Dillenberger is licensed in secondary education, but does not hold elementary licen-sure. In July 1989, Dillenberger was promoted from middle school math teacher to elementary math coordinator. As elementary math coordinator, Dillenberger spent approximately forty percent of his time in classroom instruction. His remaining time was spent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Krug v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Haak v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Beste v. Independent School District No. 697Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Mitterhauser v. MitterhauserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Cloud v. Independent School District No. 38Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API