Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1968No. Crim. 13865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUTTER, J. pro tem. *

Appellant herein was convicted of two counts of second degree burglary of two stores. He was committed to the Department of Corrections under section 3051 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. A petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied; criminal proceedings were reinstated and he was sentenced to state prison for the term prescribed by law.

Appellant’s contentions on appeal are confined to errors of law allegedly committed by the trial judge, Appellant contends that it was erroneous for the court to consider prior convictions in the absence of proof that appellant was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. EppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API