Legal Opinion

State v. Petersen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 18414PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Defendant found guilty of Sexual Contact Without Consent With Person Capable of Consenting appeals alleging trial court erred in denying his Motion for Change of Venue and eight claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Motion for Change of Venue but decline to consider Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal.

FACTS

On December 31, 1992, a Complaint was filed charging Neal Petersen (Petersen) with the offense of Sexual Contact Without Consent With Person Capable of Consenting in violation of SDCL 22-22-7.4.1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PhippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. McBrideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. Iron ShellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. TchidaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. WellnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. GarberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. McGillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API