Legal Opinion
State v. Pocock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1925No. 24,502PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
An information was filed against the defendant, the proprietor of the Frederick Hotel in the city of St. Paul, charging him with having violated the provisions of chapter 298 of the Laws of 1923 by employing one Albert Choulsett “in and about a power plant stationary boiler and engine room” of the hotel more than six days in one week. The defendant demurred to the information. The trial court overruled the demurrer and then certified the following questions to this court:
“1. Is Chapter 298, General Laws of Minnesota 1923, under which the information is preferred, repugnant to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Murray v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- State ex rel. Luria v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Driscoll v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Gasque, Inc. v. NatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- In Re Application of HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Youngquist v. Common School District No. 78Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.