Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Youngquist v. Common School District No. 78

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1930No. 27,864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

For convenience the relator below is herein referred to as plaintiff, and the respondents below as defendants.

Quo warranto on the relation of the attorney general requiring the defendant school district No. 78 to show by what right or authority it claims to exist, and the other defendants to shoiv by what warrant or authority they hold or exercise, or claim the right to hold or exercise, offices as members of the school board of said district. - The cause was heard in the district court and a judgment there entered that the school district be declared dissolved as of February 13,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Murray v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Douglas v. RittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Smith ex rel. Smith v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Thorland v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 44Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. In Re Certain School Districts, Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. State Ex Rel. Matteson v. LueckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API