Legal Opinion

Workman v. Brighton Properties, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1999No. 980056PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

¶ 1 H. Ross Workman (“Workman”) sued to prevent Brighton Properties, Inc. (“Brighton”) from levying an assessment against him for purposes of developing a water system in Silver Lake Estates Subdivision No. 1 that did not benefit Workman’s property in Silver Lake Estates Subdivision No. 2, and to invalidate a $300 assessment made against him for costs relating to a study of the water system within all of Silver Lake Estates. The district court denied Workman’s motion for summary judgment, and effectively granted sua sponte judgment for Brighton, concluding that Brighton was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Turner v. Hi-Country Homeowners Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fink v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  4. Lopez v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swan Creek Village Homeowners Ass'n v. WarneUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kelly v. Timber Lakes PropertyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. Levanger v. VincentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  4. Kelly v. Timber Lakes PropertyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. Peterson v. South Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API