Fink v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Presiding Judge:
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order declaring a subdivision’s restrictive covenant requiring wood shingle roofing to be unenforceable. Having concluded that “[t]he facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument,” Utah R.App.P. 29(a)(3), we affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiff C.W. Fink and defendant Shannon Miller purchased lots in Maple Hills Subdivision No. 3, Plat D, located in the east bench area of Bountiful, Utah. Both parties received copies of the Agreement for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Tanglewood Homes Ass'n, Inc. v. Henke, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
- Rhue v. Cheyenne Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carlton v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Fort Pierce Industrial Park Phases II, III, & IV Owners Ass'n v. ShakespeareUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- South Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Vanderwood v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.