Legal Opinion
People v. Caldwell
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided October 21, 1993PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosalyn H. Richter, J.
This decision supplements an oral ruling permitting a juror *191with a visual impairment to continue serving on the jury. The vision problem of the juror, who will be referred to as Ms. B., was not discovered until the second day of trial. At that time, Ms. B. disclosed that she had a detached retina in one eye and had limited vision in her other eye. As a result, Ms. B. explained that from her assigned seat in the jury box she could see only the outline of the witnesses’ faces, but could not see all the details of their facial expressions. She explained…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GuzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Galloway v. Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Commonwealth v. SusiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- DeLong v. BrumbaughDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Green v. North Arundel Hospital Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- People v. HayesColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- United States v. Watson, Dwight W.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Trotman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.