Legal Opinion
Trotman v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 18, 2019No. 8/19PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Danny Trotman v. State of Maryland, No. 8, September Term, 2019 PROSPECTIVE JURORS WITH DISABILITIES – AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT – MD. CODE ANN., CTS. & JUD. PROC. (1974, 2013 REPL. VOL., 2016 SUPP.) §§ 8-102(b) AND 8-103(b)(3) – Court of Appeals held that, under Americans with Disabilities Act, Maryland statutes that govern jury service, and relevant case law, trial court may not summarily excuse prospective jurors with disabilities. Instead, trial court may excuse prospective juror for cause on disability-related ground if no reasonable accommodation is possible, and, at that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Portillo Funes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- State v. ChapmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2022