Legal Opinion

People v. Guzman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1990PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*3OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Wachtler.

The question presented in this case is whether a hearing-impaired person is, by reason of that impairment, disqualified from service as a juror. We agree with the courts below, based on their factual determinations concerning the abilities of the prospective juror and the interpreter assigned to assist him, that the prospective juror’s deafness did not render him "incapable of performing in a reasonable manner the duties of a juror” (Judiciary Law § 510 [3]).

I

Defendant was tried and convicted on a charge of criminal sale of a controlled substance in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. BlydenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Lewinson v. CrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. People v. GuzmanNew York Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. People v. GuayNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. TohomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API