Legal Opinion

Woodyatt v. Bank of Old York Road

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1962No. Appeal, No. 216PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an action for malicious prosecution wherein the court below sustained preliminary objections to the complaint in the nature of a demurrer. Plaintiff appeals.

For the purposes of this appeal, all facts well pleaded in the complaint must be accepted as true: Savitz v. Weinstein, 395 Pa. 173, 149 A. 2d 110 (1959), and Robinson v. Phila., 400 Pa. 80, 161 A. 2d 1 (1960).

The complaint alleged that on April 10, 1960, the defendant-bank signed and swore to an information before a justice of the peace charging the plaintiff with having stolen or fraudulently…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Savitz v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Robinson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Curley v. Automobile Finance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Sicola v. First Nat. Bk. of AltoonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Arye v. DicksteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. John A. Hilfirty Martha L. Miller v. David C. Shipman Kenneth R. Schriner Brett O. Feese Stephen C. Schopfer Betty A. Noll. Martha MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Ammlung v. PlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Gaito v. StraussDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API