Legal Opinion

Lunz v. Neuman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1955No. 33271PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action for slander. The jury found for the defendants. The court granted plaintiff a new trial upon the following grounds: (1) Error in giving an instruction on qualified privilege, and (2) that substantial justice was denied when Mr. and Mrs. Charles Savage were permitted to testify at the trial.

Appellants contend that there was sufficient evidence to merit giving the questioned instruction; hence, it was error to grant a new trial upon the first ground. They further contend that permitting the two witnesses to testify, under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Allen v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Smith v. LeberWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Peterson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Glick v. RopesWashington Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Whm Custom Services, Inc., and Disa, Inc. v. Gilberto RinconesTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. White v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Samuelson v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gonsalves v. Nissan Motor Corp. in Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Haueter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API