Legal Opinion

Peterson v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1954No. 32876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Defendant, King county, appeals from a judgment entered against it after verdict of a jury.

Interrogatories submitted to the jury disclose that an allowance was made (a) for “the reasonable cost of repairing the damage to plaintiffs’ property” as the result of an earth slide; and (b) for “the depreciation in the market value of plaintiffs’ property.”

Plaintiffs’ property is at the bottom of a steep slope. In 1942, the county built a road across the top of the slope and, in doing so, made a fill about ten feet high and installed a drainage system. A bulkhead was built directly above plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franks v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hein v. Chrysler Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Peterson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Ralston v. VesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lasser v. Grunbaum Bros. Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lunz v. NeumanWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Barnes v. LABOR HALL ASS'N., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hurley v. Port Blakely Tree Farms LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Tyler v. TylerWashington Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API