Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Award of Attorney’s Fees; RCFC 37(a)(5)(C); Substantial Justification
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Before the court is the following issue: Whether an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(C) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) is appropriate following the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s (“Federal Circuit”) decision that only eight of the fifty-six documents that this court directed the government to produce to plaintiffs could be withheld by the government as privileged. The court deems oral argument unnecessary and, for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hyde & Drath v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Roberts v. Clark County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018