Legal Opinion

Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 4, 2017No. 13-465CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRE 502(d); Quick Peek Procedure; Clawback Order; RCFC 26; Discovery

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Before the court is plaintiffs’ second motion to compel the production of approximately 1500 documents defendant is currently withholding pursuant to the deliberative process and bank examination privileges. Plaintiffs seek access to these documents pursuant (o the “quick peek” procedure authorized by Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”). The court deems oral argument unnecessary and, for the reasons stated below, grants plaintiffs’ motion.

I. BACKGROUND 2

In their most recent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Florsheim Shoe Company, Div. Of Interco, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API